Sounds bogus. Merkel is the one demanding they be let in. The German people are trying to stop it and her administration is jailing Germans for making public statements against invaders.
Europe doesn't have free speech. Governments are jailing pastors for Hate Speech if two homos claim they heard him say ~'homosexuality is a sin' as stated in scripture.
Btw, homeland sec does stop terrorist attacks here. Normal citizens are the ones who stop it.
It was actually a friendly soccer game between Germany and The Netherlands which was supposed to be played a few hours ago. I think they just found a van full of explosives.
Sounds bogus. Merkel is the one demanding they be let in. The German people are trying to stop it and her administration is jailing Germans for making public statements against invaders.
Europe doesn't have free speech. Governments are jailing pastors for Hate Speech if two homos claim they heard him say ~'homosexuality is a sin' as stated in scripture.
Btw, homeland sec does stop terrorist attacks here. Normal citizens are the ones who stop it.
I don't think you understand what is going on? Please correct me if I am wrong on that. The objective is to get the Western Governments out of the Middle East and ANY means possible is OK with terrorists. Other reasons include war against islam=justifies jehad=justifies killing infidels and "weak muslums" that the quaran calls apostate muslums. Other reasons include revenge for war waged on the Middle Eastern Countries, wich Germany has done. It is not a "Syrian refugee" issue, it is a "terrorist" jehadist muslum issue.
To piggyback on some popular comercials: If you are a juhadist, you kill and terrorize people, that's just what you do.
[This message has been edited by Rickady88GT (edited 11-17-2015).]
Last news I heard was that the bomb threat was a hoax. Then there was another which wasn't confirmed so they cancelled the match to be safe, but later there was an ambulance found with explosives that wasn't at that location. Haven't bothered looking for updates or verification
quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:
I don't think you understand what is going on? Please correct me if I am wrong on that. The objective is to get the Western Governments out of the Middle East and ANY means possible is OK with terrorists. Other reasons include war against islam=justifies jehad=justifies killing infidels and "weak muslums" that the quaran calls apostate muslums. Other reasons include revenge for war waged on the Middle Eastern Countries, wich Germany has done. It is not a "Syrian refugee" issue, it is a "terrorist" jehadist muslum issue.
To piggyback on some popular comercials: If you are a juhadist, you kill and terrorize people, that's just what you do.
I don't mind correcting you then. That is NOT what's going on in the Near East. Merkel has cooled on US/NATO demands and is negotiating with Russia, going around the boycotting policy dictated by the USA because it would stagnate their economy worse. This has occurred since Ed Snowden blew the whistle that the USA has been tapping her personal phone and communications. I watch a mostly European website which is centered on those nations with dominant political and economic engines. Merkel is notorious in her nation for such a public policy of demanding that Germans take refugees in, which will number in the millions. Germany is the jewel of the EU economically. That's exactly where most of those refugees would want to relocate to become immediately rich in their lifestyle increase. If someone were going to bomb Merkel, it would be a German. They're even evicting ethnic Germans to place refugees.
What is going on in the Near East is scrambling the borders of nations there to remake them for the benefit of Saudi Arabia and Israel, the two dominant nations.
[This message has been edited by mental floss (edited 11-17-2015).]
People are so much easier to lead around by the nose when you drive their blood pressure up, like when they're looking for reasons to hate people. I can guarantee that anybody visiting this website will not be a target of terrorism.
Merkel is a Polish communist. This is her marching in uniform with her comrades as a young woman before unification. Merkel, the Red footsoldier: German chancellor under fire over Communist links as image of her in uniform is released
Last news I heard was that the bomb threat was a hoax. Then there was another which wasn't confirmed so they cancelled the match to be safe, but later there was an ambulance found with explosives that wasn't at that location. Haven't bothered looking for updates or verification
I don't mind correcting you then. That is NOT what's going on in the Near East. Merkel has cooled on US/NATO demands and is negotiating with Russia, going around the boycotting policy dictated by the USA because it would stagnate their economy worse. This has occurred since Ed Snowden blew the whistle that the USA has been tapping her personal phone and communications. I watch a mostly European website which is centered on those nations with dominant political and economic engines. Merkel is notorious in her nation for such a public policy of demanding that Germans take refugees in, which will number in the millions. Germany is the jewel of the EU economically. That's exactly where most of those refugees would want to relocate to become immediately rich in their lifestyle increase. If someone were going to bomb Merkel, it would be a German. They're even evicting ethnic Germans to place refugees.
What is going on in the Near East is scrambling the borders of nations there to remake them for the benefit of Saudi Arabia and Israel, the two dominant nations.
You have not yet corrected me? Jehadists attack ANYONE they please. They have a reason to attack Germany and France and the rest of the Western World for that matter. In their eyes they are guilty of war against islam.
I wasn't trying to convince you; just making note. But yes Jihadis are insolent. Usama and his bunch got themselves run out of Saudi Arabia for attacking Americans in SA. Odd that they went to the group that the USA federal government created.
I wasn't trying to convince you; just making note. But yes Jihadis are insolent. Usama and his bunch got themselves run out of Saudi Arabia for attacking Americans in SA. Odd that they went to the group that the USA federal government created.
A serious question, you have been banned from this forum before, haven't you?
I've never been in this part of the forum before the past week, when the concert was attacked. My turn to ask a question. Why would you associate my posts with being banned? Because I'm not Politically Correct? Two members here have personally assailed me for the likes of pointing out that a politician of a foreign nation has had a warrant issued for his arrest for directing commandos that executed people in international waters. The UN condemned it as a war crime.
Do people in this forum typically attack people for reporting a current event in the news if it offends them?
[This message has been edited by mental floss (edited 11-17-2015).]
I've never been in this part of the forum before the past week, when the concert was attacked. My turn to ask a question. Why would you associate my posts with being banned? Because I'm not Politically Correct? Two members here have personally assailed me for the likes of pointing out that a politician of a foreign nation has had a warrant issued for his arrest for directing commandos that executed people in international waters. The UN condemned it as a war crime.
Do people in this forum typically attack people for reporting a current event in the news if it offends them?
Well, first off, I asked a question NOT assumed. Second I did not attack you or purposefully offend you. IF, you had asked "why" I asked the question I would have been more than willing to state a reason. Sense you "implied" a question, I will answer it with a real reply. I asked because you have a distinct way of typing out your thoughts. This type of thought has been seen in at least one member that has been banned some time ago. Nothing more, nothing less. If you are not that member, then take this as a heads up, you sound like a person that has caused trouble. That may be why people respond to your posts as they have. I am only saying this because I don't want you to get jammed up in a train wreck that you did not see coming.
BTW, I am proud of NOT being politically correct. I see political correctness as an insult to common sense.
[This message has been edited by Rickady88GT (edited 11-17-2015).]
Well, first off, I asked a question NOT assumed. Second I did not attack you or purposefully offend you. IF, you had asked "why" I asked the question I would have been more than willing to state a reason. Sense you "implied" a question, I will answer it with a real reply. I asked because you have a distinct way of typing out your thoughts. This type of thought has been seen in at least one member that has been banned some time ago. Nothing more, nothing less. If you are not that member, then take this as a heads up, you sound like a person that has caused trouble. That may be why people respond to your posts as they have. I am only saying this because I don't want you to get jammed up in a train wreck that you did not see coming.
BTW, I am proud of NOT being politically correct. I see political correctness as an insult to common sense.
Fair enough, brother.
Hopefully my answer will assure any of those curious members reading NOT to pair my postings and thoughts with any past member. I don't know them, and I wouldn't make their posts. I'm just me. Never been here, which was on purpose because I hate the PC climate of these type of forums. I'm not saying you are PC at this moment, just that in general people don't realize they're PC until someone says something that is uncomfortable to their mental programming.
Hopefully my answer will assure any of those curious members reading NOT to pair my postings and thoughts with any past member. I don't know them, and I wouldn't make their posts. I'm just me. Never been here, which was on purpose because I hate the PC climate of these type of forums. I'm not saying you are PC at this moment, just that in general people don't realize they're PC until someone says something that is uncomfortable to their mental programming.
OK, for what it is worth, this section of the forum is less likely to be politically correct,..... that is unless you have a VERY narrow definition of political correctness. But nun the less, we can still get along as long, as long as we can defend our words with defensible points of view and convincing argument.
I've never been in this part of the forum before the past week, when the concert was attacked. My turn to ask a question. Why would you associate my posts with being banned? Because I'm not Politically Correct? Two members here have personally assailed me for the likes of pointing out that a politician of a foreign nation has had a warrant issued for his arrest for directing commandos that executed people in international waters. The UN condemned it as a war crime.
Do people in this forum typically attack people for reporting a current event in the news if it offends them?
Do you mean 'shoot the messenger"? To be honest, yes, tho it isn't at all confined to just this board. Mostly, those on the far left receive the most static over their posting and postulations.
No one outside the far left really gives a crap about the impotent blue beanie UN or what they might condemn. Neither the USA or Israel recognize the ICC and neither have signed the treaty to accept.
10.In a communication received on 6 May 2002, the Government of the United States of America informed the Secretary-General of the following: "This is to inform you, in connection with the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted on July 17, 1998, that the United States does not intend to become a party to the treaty. Accordingly, the United States has no legal obligations arising from its signature on December 31, 2000. The United States requests that its intention not to become a party, as expressed in this letter, be reflected in the depositary’s status lists relating to this treaty.”
3.In a communication received on 28 August 2002, the Government of Israel informed the Secretary-General of the following: ".....in connection with the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted on 17 July 1998, [...] Israel does not intend to become a party to the treaty. Accordingly, Israel has no legal obligations arising from its signature on 31 December 2000. Israel requests that its intention not to become a party, as expressed in this letter, be reflected in the depositary’s status lists relating to this treaty."
[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 11-18-2015).]
Israel still hasn't honored their commitments from the Camp David Accords. They have no intention of peace. they've even stolen our nuclear secrets,passing them off to Russia.
Of course you wouldn't acknowledge that Hamas has been funded by Israel since back in the 1970s, just as Al Qaeda is today funded by the USA. You also wouldn't ignore the "rocket" attacks which kill nobody. All Israel has to do is have one of their Hamas operatives fire one within Palestine and Israel can tell dummies on talk radio/TV it's another reason to go murder civilians. They've killed hundreds of children in the past few yrs.
Israel has also passed internal laws to vacate ARAB land which they then ignore. Because they don't want peace. They want to continue the genocide. And thanks for agreeing that the US is a total hypocrite regarding the UN, pushing some nations to conform or die, while vetoing other identical rulings.
The US is the UN. The only reason it still exists is because we are the militant and economic enforcers of it. Israel refuses to sign the Nuke Nonproliferation Treaty while having hundreds of nuke weapons. By US law (the Simington Ammendment and The Glenn Act) it's illegal for the US to given military aid to any nuke power that refuses inspections or to sign. The US is the globe's hypocrite. Israel is with North Korea in not signing. They've also been busted offering nuke material to South Africa.
quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:
But nun the less, we can still get along as long, as long as we can defend our words with defensible points of view and convincing argument.
So far two regular posters here have repeatedly run to the Politcally Correct left because someone said something about a nation they consider their god, including the one posting above me.
People are so much easier to lead around by the nose when you drive their blood pressure up, like when they're looking for reasons to hate people. I can guarantee that anybody visiting this website will not be a target of terrorism.
Jackspear has been missing and you start posting allot.. hummmmmmm
Hopefully my answer will assure any of those curious members reading NOT to pair my postings and thoughts with any past member. I don't know them, and I wouldn't make their posts. I'm just me. Never been here, which was on purpose because I hate the PC climate of these type of forums. I'm not saying you are PC at this moment, just that in general people don't realize they're PC until someone says something that is uncomfortable to their mental programming.
I consider one way to define PC as being offended for someone else, not annoyed for ones own sake. Respect goes a long way.
I already posted I don't like totalitarians and NAZIs were just that.
You have something in common with NAZIs. They post 88 in their usernames which stands for heil Hitler.
quote
Originally posted by E.Furgal:
one and the same..
one of the good things about having a forum, the tools that come with it
It's not my fault you knocked your own front teeth out when you got busted lying about the quote you posted. You really don't want to learn what I can teach you about your limitations.
I already posted I don't like totalitarians and NAZIs were just that.
You have something in common with NAZIs. They post 88 in their usernames which stands for heil Hitler.
It's not my fault you knocked your own front teeth out when you got busted lying about the quote you posted. You really don't want to learn what I can teach you about your limitations.
That is NOT what's going on in the Near East. Merkel has cooled on US/NATO demands and is negotiating with Russia, going around the boycotting policy dictated by the USA because it would stagnate their economy worse. This has occurred since Ed Snowden blew the whistle that the USA has been tapping her personal phone and communications. I watch a mostly European website which is centered on those nations with dominant political and economic engines. Merkel is notorious in her nation for such a public policy of demanding that Germans take refugees in, which will number in the millions. Germany is the jewel of the EU economically. That's exactly where most of those refugees would want to relocate to become immediately rich in their lifestyle increase.
