Originally posted by Cliff Pennock: he has reported 10,978 posts averaging over 1,200 posts per month.
quote
Originally posted by Cliff Pennock: only reports posts he participated in (and only reports posts that are of certain people or have a certain political preference).
My guess to help narrow it down is that is must be a Hillery supporter, as I don't see there being 10,978 post being for her.
I did not think he got into that many political threads? I figured he mostly argues for attention. Good or bad, he just likes to turn on his device and reply to comments made about his comments.
I wish I were being paid for posting my bloviations on Pennock's.
I do have an odd anecdote to share, though. Some years ago, I was active on another messages board. It was set up for eye care professionals. Eye doctors, opticians, lens lab technicians. I was not in any of those categories, but I went online there when I wanted to start using prescription lenses of the "progressive" or "no-line bifocal" category. I was asking about their opinions on these products, which brands they liked... and then I saw that they also had an O/T section, like here. It was not "Off Topic", it was "Just Conversation." Same thing.
This was during the era of George W. Bush. There was a time when there were daily news reports about the uranium centrifuges in Iran, and whether Israel was going to use their air force against Iran, and whether the U.S. was going to get involved. There were several news reports about the "bunker buster" bombs that were designed to attack targets like underground nuclear labs and heavily fortified or underground military command and control bunkers.
So I put up a long message (post) about the different kinds of bunker buster bombs that had been tested, or that were being described as ideas or concepts. It was all material that I collected online from various websites, Popular Mechanics or maybe Popular Science.
Anybody could have collected the same material online and worked it into a blog entry or messages board post. I had photographs and diagrams. I reworked the text that I collected. I tried to make it look like a very slick Popular Mechanics or Popular Science writeup, with an anything but dead serious attitude to it.
A few days later, I got an email from someone who said that he was a reporter or contributor for some defense industry journals. "Defense Industry News" or "Aerospace and Defense News." Journals of that kind. Material that anyone could find online. (Or receive by snail mail.)
He said he was thinking that maybe we could collaborate on a new article that he was already thinking about.
I guess he thought that I was actually involved (or had previously been involved) in some really "cutting edge" military weapons development.
I emailed him back, kind of hopefully, with this same explanation of my "research methodology." I mean, basically, I said yeah, I'm not really a "rocket scientist" about this stuff. It's not something I was ever involved in, personally. Just material that I had found online with Google (etc.) I told him he was free to use any of the material that I had worked up and posted online, and that if he did, I hoped he would credit me by name.
I never heard from him again.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 07-06-2017).]
HAHAHA after your p.m. rant, I'd not be shocked that it was you that is the butthurt surfer.. J/K my bet is lord shadeball aka the paid poster
Why don't you tell us about this "p.m. rant". I have never sent a single message to you.
And it is not "lord shadeball". He has a level of maturity you will never attain. You just disagree with his opinion, and you don't like having to keep asking an adult as you attempt to decipher his posts.
edit: as a matter of fact, why don't you post any "rant" I have ever made.
[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 07-06-2017).]
Why don't you tell us about this "p.m. rant". I have never sent a single message to you.
And it is not "lord shadeball". He has a level of maturity you will never attain. You just disagree with his opinion, and you don't like having to keep asking an adult as you attempt to decipher his posts.
edit: as a matter of fact, why don't you post any "rant" I have ever made.
YOU ARE FULL OF **** HERE IS THE REPLY AFTER YOUR FLIPPING RANT .... The rant was a vile pyle .. and a warning that you'd put me in my place if I pm'd you ever again..
Topic: Re: New Guitar williegoat Member
04-24-2017 04:11 AM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to Visit williegoat's HomepageClick Here to Email williegoat
I will post a photo when I get a chance, sorry if it is not going to be "fast enough " for you.. I have to cover any markings So shadeball can not email the local muslim mosque like he did last time, with a photo of me, I'd rather not die.. So you can either wait, or not.. My guess is you won't..
And it is not "lord shadeball". He has a level of maturity you will never attain. You just disagree with his opinion, and you don't like having to keep asking an adult as you attempt to decipher his posts.
Ya that's it.. Sure.. You are quite the p.o.s. See pm posted above as seen as you clearly have a memory problem This years marathon we had a guy from cali that requested to work in the sector as those working undercover.. Ya a person from cali. requesting to volunteer to work that sector.. keep your flippin blinders on..
[This message has been edited by E.Furgal (edited 07-06-2017).]
Oh snap! Shadeball (comedically, I just couldn't resist) is sending pictures of the Pennocks Fiero Forum members he deems Infidels to Mosque's in hopes they will issue a Fatwa against said Fiero owners? Awesome!
Oh snap! Shadeball (comedically, I just couldn't resist) is sending pictures of the Pennocks Fiero Forum members he deems Infidels to Mosque's in hopes they will issue a Fatwa against said Fiero owners? Awesome!
I feel just like Salman Rushdie! :rock:
Snicker...Well, here is an infidel they can try to Fatwa with
[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 07-06-2017).]
You must be bipolar then, or a liar.. So much for a man of his word.. Good day liar ...
Eh, I have caught you with your pants down several times. Perhaps you do not own a mirror?
Get off of your horse and treat your fellow members a bit kinder please. At the moment, and for some time now, you are just cruel. Could you possibly wash out your vagina to remove some of the embedded sand?
Actually, anytime you press the PM link from a members post in a specific thread it gives you that "RE: Thread title" header to the PM. That doesn't show anything other than a PM you sent. If there was a PM before or after it we have no way of knowing as a screen shot has not been posted yet. For example, this is a PM I received from Boondawg that he sent about a thread I had created. This is his PM that initiated the contact. It's innocuous enough that I don't think he will mind.
That's what a PM looks like to the person who receives it from somebody else. In this case a PM that person is me receiving it from the somebody else being Boondawg.
*Edited to clarify that this was the starting PM to a conversation via PM, not a reply to a PM I had sent as I had sent none. It was a PM in reply to my thread that was sent as evidenced by the "RE: Thread title" as it's header.
[This message has been edited by Khw (edited 07-07-2017).]
Just as a recently banned member who received warnings and probation, this one will also self destruct soon enough. Asses to ashes, dunce to dust.
Some just can't resist the devil's call.
quote
Originally posted by williegoat:
It might be interesting to note that a very regular poster who likes to argue and pick fights with almost everyone, has been conspicuously absent since the beginning of this thread.
Here at the fake news network, we have received notice from an magnanimous source that we now have the identity of the accused anecdotal abuser of the reporting button.
Stay tuned for further updates from our on the spot reporters Hot Carl and Minnie Haha.
In the meantime, here are more accusations toward this administration and Donald J. Trump.
blahbitty blah blah...
[This message has been edited by Tony Kania (edited 07-07-2017).]