Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Totally O/T
  A Creator (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version

This topic is 2 pages long:  1   2 
Previous Page | Next Page
next newest topic | next oldest topic
A Creator by 2.5
Started on: 12-22-2020 03:36 PM
Replies: 43 (734 views)
Last post by: theBDub on 01-02-2021 08:37 PM
Jonesy
Member
Posts: 4694
From: Bama
Registered: Oct 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 104
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2021 02:45 PM Click Here to See the Profile for JonesySend a Private Message to JonesyEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by sourmash:

The blast that could've struck Mars blew off the atmosphere as well and the water was disbursed into space. Now 'they' are ready to acknowledge that Mars can still even have surface water if it's briny enough. Supposedly a test by one scientist (I think done in the 1970s) confirmed water but NASA said there wasn't and it was corrupted data.



Yeah they have found much more recently "evidence" of recent water flows on Mars.

Basically satellite pictures in areas with not much of anything there, then later pictures of the same areas showing what looks like empty river flows..

So its likely there is frozen water under the surface, and on those rare occasions Mars warms up enough that some of it melts and flows on the surface, before either evaporating or soaking back into the ground soon after..

Hell its not that abstract an idea that there are hidden underground reservoirs of frozen water on/within Mars. Hell the moon as water, so why not.

My theory is that Mars was a "living" planet back before the Earth became one, and that massive impact on Mars basically killed the planet. Gotta keep in mind the Sun billions of years ago was burning much hotter than it does today, so Mars was probably a good bit warmer back then.. If Earth even had its atmosphere yet during those times, it was probably closer to what Venus is like today..

[This message has been edited by Jonesy (edited 01-02-2021).]

IP: Logged
Patrick
Member
Posts: 37825
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 464
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2021 03:04 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PatrickSend a Private Message to PatrickEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Jonesy:

Gotta keep in mind the Sun billions of years ago was burning much hotter than it does today, so Mars was probably a good bit warmer back then.. If Earth even had its atmosphere yet during those times, it was probably closer to what Venus is like today.


That was when, perhaps day four... the day after dry land, seas, plants and trees were created?
IP: Logged
rinselberg
Member
Posts: 16118
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 147
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2021 06:58 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageSend a Private Message to rinselbergEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Jonesy:
Gotta keep in mind the Sun billions of years ago was burning much hotter than it does today

That's just part of the message (from Jonesy) but I am unclear about where that idea comes from.

Early on in the history of the Sun and the Solar System, the Sun was radiating less energy, compared to modern times. The Sun has been and continues to increase the amount of energy that it radiates outwards into space, constantly and continually increasing that amount, but increasing it ever so slowly. So, "getting hotter", but at such a very small fractional rate of increase over time, from the human perspective, as to be irrelevant to any discussion about human effects on climate and anthropogenic or man-made global warming.

That's what I have seen in all the reading (or viewing) that I have indulged in on such topics.

?

Edit: I don't think this fundamentally changes the "Creator" discussion in any way. Just a "point of order."

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 01-02-2021).]

IP: Logged
theBDub
Member
Posts: 9701
From: Dallas,TX
Registered: May 2010


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 159
Rate this member

Report this Post01-02-2021 08:37 PM Click Here to See the Profile for theBDubSend a Private Message to theBDubEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I grew up with a strong belief in a personal relationship with my creator. Not only did I believe in a God, I knew him and preached his Word to others.

Maybe 9 years ago or so, I came to the (slow) realization that I did not believe in God. I also said I would never be one of those atheists who had to prove to religious folks how stupid they were. I am an atheist, but I’ll never be that person. I believe religion is an overall benefit to most of humanity.
IP: Logged
Previous Page | Next Page

This topic is 2 pages long:  1   2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock