We already decided that wasn't kiddie ****. A kid watching porno, is not kiddie ****.
Who's we? And is it really this necesary to go on and on trying to decide what level wrong doing that kind of perverted thing was on? Does possibly deciding it make it any less wrong? Does it make the sick perverts who made it any less sick and perverted? Some of you seem to spend more time trying to argue what level of wrong that pic was at instead of trying to agree that it was wrong no matter what level you feel it was. It was certainly wrong enough to get the two perverted losers instantly banned for doing it. Now they are unfortunately back yet "again" and cocky enough to continue to brag about it, joke about it and thumb their noses at us all by also continually making rude references to it. Yeah, they are definetly the kind of sick members we need stalking all over this forum Do the right thing allready and vote thier sick perverted butts off this forum that Cliff and the many loyal members have helped build.
Do the right thing allready and vote thier sick perverted butts off this forum that Cliff and the many loyal members have helped build.
I'll vote when I see fit. I see a lot more members doing worse (well, less worse, but constantly), but can't do anything about them, because majority rules.
[This message has been edited by JohnnyK (edited 11-02-2004).]
Uhm, are you implying that only I'm bumping the thread? Not to forget that it was hijacked by a couple of sick perverts but it is still my thread, though you might want to check the dates of all those others who have been doing the bumping..
Uhm, are you implying that only I'm bumping the thread? Not to forget that it was hijacked by a couple of sick perverts but it is still my thread, though you might want to check the dates of all those others who have been doing the bumping..
Well it looks like the sick perverts are here to stay, so the way I see it, you have 3 choices on how to deal with them..
We already decided that wasn't kiddie ****. A kid watching porno, is not kiddie ****.
No Johnny.. We decided that the picture he had edited was not kiddie ****.. But his comments were definitely stating the he watched kiddie pornography and that Jordan participated in it... Quit defending someone who is obviously wrong.
No Johnny.. We decided that the picture he had edited was not kiddie ****.. But his comments were definitely stating the he watched kiddie pornography and that Jordan participated in it... Quit defending someone who is obviously wrong.
I'll stop defending someone when I think they are wrong. But you are the one who stated "We could get him arrested for child pornography" and plain and simply, no, no you couldn't.. It's ridiculous. Reasonable Doubt comes to mind.
Johnny, give it a freakin' rest allready. EVERYONE knows it was wrong, even you. Even Shaun and John knew it was very wrong, which is exactly why they did it in the first place. However, you obviously just want to try and keep something stirred up so you have an excuse to post something. And yes, in a court system that image would be considered very wrong as well, and could very possibly get him in serious trouble if someone wanted to pursue it. Child **** or just very wrong it doesn't matter. It was very wrong and very inappropriate and those who are responsible or stick up for such actions should be treated accordingly.
[This message has been edited by Fiero5 (edited 11-08-2004).]
I'll stop defending someone when I think they are wrong. But you are the one who stated "We could get him arrested for child pornography" and plain and simply, no, no you couldn't.. It's ridiculous. Reasonable Doubt comes to mind.
I'm sure you are paraphrasing because that is not what I said... What I did say is that he publicly admits look at child **** and then goes on to accuse Jordan of being involved in it.
I keep wondering why I have to repeat this over and over.. I just posted it again in the very thread that you responded to yet you incorrectly 'quoted' me. The picture is in bad taste, but the picture is not what I have ever been talking about.. It is his words that I am talking about.. And saying that he 'thinks he saw Jordan in a **** movie recently' leaves little room for reasonable doubt.
I dont like ricers (look at the name) but who cares if he turned his fiero into a wannabe one. It is HIS so therefore he could do whatever he wanted with it and if he got it into a mag, great one day I hope to accomplish that too. But everyone has an opinion and you know what they say...
I dont like ricers (look at the name) but who cares if he turned his fiero into a wannabe one. It is HIS so therefore he could do whatever he wanted with it and if he got it into a mag, great one day I hope to accomplish that too. But everyone has an opinion and you know what they say...
There's more to it then that. You'll learn in time.
OK, I'll tell. Probably better than having firefox answer.
When Fiero5 has things done to his son's car that are beyond his personal tech level he apparantly fills in the gaps of what happened with educated guesses. This satisfies his son who would not likely understand tech answers anyway. The rub comes when theses guesses are repeated as facts in this forum. Guaranteed someone will point out any lapses in accuracy here. Some take it personal as if Fiero5 is deliberately trying to mislead them, or at least they act like they do. And that puts a lot of Fiero5 threads in the trashcan. Lots of friction and bad feelings generated by this.
